<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Baby, You Got a Stew Goin'! - Latest Comments in No Wonder Christgau Was Fired</title><link>http://babystew.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://babystew.disqus.com/no_wonder_christgau_was_fired/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:08:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: No Wonder Christgau Was Fired</title><link>http://www.babystew.com/?p=615#comment-7079742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I dunno, it says enough about their new album to convince me that I haven't made a mistake ignoring these guys.  "barrow boy"?  "Civil war romance"?  "Inspired by the Japanese tale of the same name...".&lt;br&gt;Yup, just what I thought these guys were about.  Thanks Bob!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sal C</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Wonder Christgau Was Fired</title><link>http://www.babystew.com/?p=615#comment-7079741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  As Steve said, it's not that it's badly written or unfair, it just says exactly &lt;i&gt;nothing&lt;/i&gt; about the music.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:39:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Wonder Christgau Was Fired</title><link>http://www.babystew.com/?p=615#comment-7079740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope that there's more of a review in the print version.  Otherwise, the fact that there's noting "in that review that's unfair" is wholly beside the point.  &lt;i&gt;There is nothing in that review, period&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only things this review says about this new album:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1) It continues to have obscure lyrics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(2) It has two long songs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(3) It's on a major label.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, that ain't criticism.  And, again, I hope there's more in the print edition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Wonder Christgau Was Fired</title><link>http://www.babystew.com/?p=615#comment-7079739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, I don't always agree with the guy, but I still find him interesting. I like the Decemberists and all, but I don't see anything in that review that's unfair. By the way, guarantee you that's only a snippet of it. The whole thing must be in the magazine itself. Besides, he clearly likes the record, but to me their "literary" qualities can be a tad much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Wonder Christgau Was Fired</title><link>http://www.babystew.com/?p=615#comment-7079738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wait, that's the &lt;i&gt;entire&lt;/i&gt; review?  Unbelievable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's hope the blame lies with the RS editors.  Yeesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>